Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-25 23:59:26 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 237BFF7D3EF7DD2C414CDD961133DA65B3E843D370AB6288CCEF0D7F99FF3655
Participant Details

Original Note:

Suggested note is an Op-Ed column; one attorney (even a gov't attorney)'s opinion on the potential legality of not-as-of-yet extant laws or propositions are not fact nor sufficient to render this tweet misleading or counterfactual. Best place for that context is in replies. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1650995583803437061
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 237BFF7D3EF7DD2C414CDD961133DA65B3E843D370AB6288CCEF0D7F99FF3655
  • createdAtMillis - 1682467166221
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1650995583803437061237BFF7D3EF7DD2C414CDD961133DA65B3E843D370AB6288CCEF0D7F99FF3655