Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-27 13:01:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B2548C5529A0C3722CC6AAF278DE766D50B439EB6A326636A5EEF5FDC8EF33BC
Participant Details

Original Note:

Claims in tweet are factual, and study evidence consistent with similar longitudinal studies, at best you could say the tweets language might be misleading (higher suicidality versus general pop in study), but that's too nitpicky for a CN. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1650893326172958721
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B2548C5529A0C3722CC6AAF278DE766D50B439EB6A326636A5EEF5FDC8EF33BC
  • createdAtMillis - 1682600480242
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1650893326172958721B2548C5529A0C3722CC6AAF278DE766D50B439EB6A326636A5EEF5FDC8EF33BC