Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-01 14:28:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6C346D5F644EE496E87A29B6B4AE83C4C5F234CC9DA786DE2DA6A49B1720B649
Participant Details

Original Note:

Claims in tweet are factual, and study evidence consistent with similar longitudinal studies, at best you could say the tweets language might be misleading (higher suicidality versus general pop in study), but that's too nitpicky for a CN. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1650893326172958721
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6C346D5F644EE496E87A29B6B4AE83C4C5F234CC9DA786DE2DA6A49B1720B649
  • createdAtMillis - 1682951310197
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16508933261729587216C346D5F644EE496E87A29B6B4AE83C4C5F234CC9DA786DE2DA6A49B1720B649