Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-28 11:43:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5619C4FC3A21C252EE0EB0E15FC04C0DABD77BE4288A3EC8EA67586D738859A5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Claims in tweet are factual, and study evidence consistent with similar longitudinal studies, at best you could say the tweets language might be misleading (higher suicidality versus general pop in study), but that's too nitpicky for a CN. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1650893326172958721
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5619C4FC3A21C252EE0EB0E15FC04C0DABD77BE4288A3EC8EA67586D738859A5
  • createdAtMillis - 1682682189059
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16508933261729587215619C4FC3A21C252EE0EB0E15FC04C0DABD77BE4288A3EC8EA67586D738859A5