Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-27 04:52:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 47AD3BD4ED0E64C9EA74DB3A322FA6AA5E5F8D84E57A6E405CC624F53C571EC8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Claims in tweet are factual, and study evidence consistent with similar longitudinal studies, at best you could say the tweets language might be misleading (higher suicidality versus general pop in study), but that's too nitpicky for a CN. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1650893326172958721
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 47AD3BD4ED0E64C9EA74DB3A322FA6AA5E5F8D84E57A6E405CC624F53C571EC8
  • createdAtMillis - 1682571135460
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165089332617295872147AD3BD4ED0E64C9EA74DB3A322FA6AA5E5F8D84E57A6E405CC624F53C571EC8