Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-28 07:09:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3A47DE5FD49CCCAA21A4E598501A48B8D26BEA3F212E2C5227411AF6E971D623
Participant Details

Original Note:

Claims in tweet are factual, and study evidence consistent with similar longitudinal studies, at best you could say the tweets language might be misleading (higher suicidality versus general pop in study), but that's too nitpicky for a CN. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1650893326172958721
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3A47DE5FD49CCCAA21A4E598501A48B8D26BEA3F212E2C5227411AF6E971D623
  • createdAtMillis - 1682665770053
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16508933261729587213A47DE5FD49CCCAA21A4E598501A48B8D26BEA3F212E2C5227411AF6E971D623