Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-25 15:53:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0D2CA9518810AB9BD0EAD164531CEE587F4E2188180DCAD38FE1E888B8D4D435
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet highlights a suggested note that “needs more ratings”. Because of the open-source algorithm used to rank notes, it is very unlikely it would ever be promoted to the public feed. The poster either misunderstands this or is deliberately misrepresents it. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/under-the-hood/ranking-notes

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1650887736142749696
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0D2CA9518810AB9BD0EAD164531CEE587F4E2188180DCAD38FE1E888B8D4D435
  • createdAtMillis - 1682438023924
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16508877361427496960D2CA9518810AB9BD0EAD164531CEE587F4E2188180DCAD38FE1E888B8D4D435