Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-25 14:31:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 236EFFF44CEE6BED38B34646904B1FFC17EFA29053E84CBBCF99490B63F83939
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a political campaign tweet and its rhetoric is allowed. In New York Times Co. v. Sullivan , the Supreme Court ruled that the First Amendment provides a high level of protection for campaign speech. https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/990/regulation-of-political-campaigns

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1650856131382636545
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 236EFFF44CEE6BED38B34646904B1FFC17EFA29053E84CBBCF99490B63F83939
  • createdAtMillis - 1682433065045
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1650856131382636545236EFFF44CEE6BED38B34646904B1FFC17EFA29053E84CBBCF99490B63F83939