Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-25 13:55:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4A82804F6995D4EA440D1FB902B4C8772B4FBCD846431F4E7B6451F4491778C2
Participant Details

Original Note:

This article supposedly was published by The Conversation; however, they have stated that it was not real. https://twitter.com/ConversationUK/status/1617580012038651911?t=oB-lMlWhP2ZJ-Cu0j2DS5w&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1650846022812180482
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4A82804F6995D4EA440D1FB902B4C8772B4FBCD846431F4E7B6451F4491778C2
  • createdAtMillis - 1682430910778
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16508460228121804824A82804F6995D4EA440D1FB902B4C8772B4FBCD846431F4E7B6451F4491778C2