Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-25 18:21:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FDCE1FE4470B33669F34D45F9B6CB883DE6481C8083E9B6C6BBDB117B038287F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note arguing with Don Lemon’s response to Ramaswamy belongs in the replies, not in community notes. Notes are not here to promote your agenda, they’re for fact checking misinformation. “Community notes is not a place for quick dunks, personal opinions, or insults” https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1650796620370391040
participantId -
raterParticipantId - FDCE1FE4470B33669F34D45F9B6CB883DE6481C8083E9B6C6BBDB117B038287F
createdAtMillis - 1682446867100
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1650796620370391040FDCE1FE4470B33669F34D45F9B6CB883DE6481C8083E9B6C6BBDB117B038287F