Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-02 14:54:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E1310C4CE71674DF8EFC3849C156206C5770EFF5D1A0582601A2F8FA7870D829
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note provided is trying to say there's no proof, but the article and Tweet both directly say there is no proof or given link at all. There's nothing misleading here.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1650596802041618461
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E1310C4CE71674DF8EFC3849C156206C5770EFF5D1A0582601A2F8FA7870D829
  • createdAtMillis - 1683039260978
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1650596802041618461E1310C4CE71674DF8EFC3849C156206C5770EFF5D1A0582601A2F8FA7870D829