Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-25 00:13:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E032080054C5DA604C52AAFCE0D8187557FAD1D22277320DA4D8C7EF5672B322
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note provided is trying to say there's no proof, but the article and Tweet both directly say there is no proof or given link at all. There's nothing misleading here.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1650596802041618461
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E032080054C5DA604C52AAFCE0D8187557FAD1D22277320DA4D8C7EF5672B322
  • createdAtMillis - 1682381583471
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1650596802041618461E032080054C5DA604C52AAFCE0D8187557FAD1D22277320DA4D8C7EF5672B322