Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-24 20:33:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9FEAA20C8984029E57691E6DC53C62675E2BF72E4E20E9363E3DE7439EDB58C5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note provided is trying to say there's no proof, but the article and Tweet both directly say there is no proof or given link at all. There's nothing misleading here.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1650596802041618461
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9FEAA20C8984029E57691E6DC53C62675E2BF72E4E20E9363E3DE7439EDB58C5
  • createdAtMillis - 1682368413633
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16505968020416184619FEAA20C8984029E57691E6DC53C62675E2BF72E4E20E9363E3DE7439EDB58C5