Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-02 14:54:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 791B49B50F7181A6EA1EA3F8AC543BF91D6DF8DBFED19AF9F8BCAFB5B183A3FE
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note provided is trying to say there's no proof, but the article and Tweet both directly say there is no proof or given link at all. There's nothing misleading here.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1650596802041618461
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 791B49B50F7181A6EA1EA3F8AC543BF91D6DF8DBFED19AF9F8BCAFB5B183A3FE
  • createdAtMillis - 1683039260978
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1650596802041618461791B49B50F7181A6EA1EA3F8AC543BF91D6DF8DBFED19AF9F8BCAFB5B183A3FE