Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-28 00:56:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 65E5D5B5DF6DBB1D98357EF9C6C52F020800E0FC08F00E86ABEBDF164F55EEDB
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note provided is trying to say there's no proof, but the article and Tweet both directly say there is no proof or given link at all. There's nothing misleading here.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1650596802041618461
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 65E5D5B5DF6DBB1D98357EF9C6C52F020800E0FC08F00E86ABEBDF164F55EEDB
  • createdAtMillis - 1682643362923
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165059680204161846165E5D5B5DF6DBB1D98357EF9C6C52F020800E0FC08F00E86ABEBDF164F55EEDB