Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-24 21:24:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 74E58FA83744E524658ABCA5B13A0585DD2944D50E4BE0301C4A81EAA689B71E
Participant Details

Original Note:

There are very clearly no factual claims in this tweet, and it’s bordering on abuse of the notes system to try to put one on this; issues taken with the opinion expressed or the contents of the campaign in the link should be taken up in the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1650497647369760770
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 74E58FA83744E524658ABCA5B13A0585DD2944D50E4BE0301C4A81EAA689B71E
  • createdAtMillis - 1682371492590
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165049764736976077074E58FA83744E524658ABCA5B13A0585DD2944D50E4BE0301C4A81EAA689B71E