Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-24 00:27:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4E615590BE04BC0B17BFDBCD570AD7EBB1E9E9BF2799A8530863465D41B432B5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Actually this info may be misleading because twitter increased the verification accessibility and scope: https://help.twitter.com/en/managing-your-account/about-twitter-verified-accounts https://help.twitter.com/en/using-twitter/verified-organization

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1650255702781206530
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4E615590BE04BC0B17BFDBCD570AD7EBB1E9E9BF2799A8530863465D41B432B5
  • createdAtMillis - 1682296078839
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16502557027812065304E615590BE04BC0B17BFDBCD570AD7EBB1E9E9BF2799A8530863465D41B432B5