Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-23 17:42:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EF4A741B59ED8F41217DAD4877A4ED3169C26D4EB197482268DEFDE7ED0AB453
Participant Details

Original Note:

It is neither accurate nor inaccurate to call WSJ a “total trumper” publication as that is an opinion. It is misleading and potentially inaccurate to identify said opinion as propaganda, unless every political opinion is qualified as such.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1650143932733435905
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EF4A741B59ED8F41217DAD4877A4ED3169C26D4EB197482268DEFDE7ED0AB453
  • createdAtMillis - 1682271742231
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1650143932733435905EF4A741B59ED8F41217DAD4877A4ED3169C26D4EB197482268DEFDE7ED0AB453