Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-25 03:21:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8216546CD13017F86061D8F9DE37214C0F6289BB26EA94A04F1DA4A5E03C6485
Participant Details

Original Note:

It is neither accurate nor inaccurate to call WSJ a “total trumper” publication as that is an opinion. It is misleading and potentially inaccurate to identify said opinion as propaganda, unless every political opinion is qualified as such.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1650143932733435905
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8216546CD13017F86061D8F9DE37214C0F6289BB26EA94A04F1DA4A5E03C6485
  • createdAtMillis - 1682392904870
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16501439327334359058216546CD13017F86061D8F9DE37214C0F6289BB26EA94A04F1DA4A5E03C6485