Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-23 14:41:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 35BD1AEC7D37E98FCD35A70832425181545C89241E1DA306782149A939A14AA7
Participant Details

Original Note:

It is neither accurate nor inaccurate to call WSJ a “total trumper” publication as that is an opinion. It is misleading and potentially inaccurate to identify said opinion as propaganda, unless every political opinion is qualified as such.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1650143932733435905
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 35BD1AEC7D37E98FCD35A70832425181545C89241E1DA306782149A939A14AA7
  • createdAtMillis - 1682260882217
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165014393273343590535BD1AEC7D37E98FCD35A70832425181545C89241E1DA306782149A939A14AA7