Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-23 14:41:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1ABF097BCB8AEAE50E78826E687B52D7FA1C41E83C109BA0522D3AC3645ED677
Participant Details

Original Note:

It is neither accurate nor inaccurate to call WSJ a “total trumper” publication as that is an opinion. It is misleading and potentially inaccurate to identify said opinion as propaganda, unless every political opinion is qualified as such.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1650143932733435905
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1ABF097BCB8AEAE50E78826E687B52D7FA1C41E83C109BA0522D3AC3645ED677
  • createdAtMillis - 1682260882217
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16501439327334359051ABF097BCB8AEAE50E78826E687B52D7FA1C41E83C109BA0522D3AC3645ED677