Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-23 04:08:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A334F41CE034FB74A5786FC5EE68D3D4479B9F9AD6FF8D05CD48FDD6D14CBB65
Participant Details

Original Note:

To put aside that the post is a gross interpretation of sex (technically an opinion, no need for a note), the current added context is only there for comedic purposes, and should not be on the tweet at all. Please do not use community notes simply to be funny, nor encourage it.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1649969527818534912
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A334F41CE034FB74A5786FC5EE68D3D4479B9F9AD6FF8D05CD48FDD6D14CBB65
  • createdAtMillis - 1682222900942
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1649969527818534912A334F41CE034FB74A5786FC5EE68D3D4479B9F9AD6FF8D05CD48FDD6D14CBB65