Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-23 03:02:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 898F714F8BAC164371CA30236DCC72CDC6AE8F65E109CCE72D680E50128A4AAD
Participant Details

Original Note:

To put aside that the post is a gross interpretation of sex (technically an opinion, no need for a note), the current added context is only there for comedic purposes, and should not be on the tweet at all. Please do not use community notes simply to be funny, nor encourage it.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1649969527818534912
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 898F714F8BAC164371CA30236DCC72CDC6AE8F65E109CCE72D680E50128A4AAD
  • createdAtMillis - 1682218971396
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1649969527818534912898F714F8BAC164371CA30236DCC72CDC6AE8F65E109CCE72D680E50128A4AAD