Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-23 03:02:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 232B9F8848A0BEC776DA37EA0ECF71A1A4FC625EF2D2E672DE7CB535DE29ED3B
Participant Details

Original Note:

To put aside that the post is a gross interpretation of sex (technically an opinion, no need for a note), the current added context is only there for comedic purposes, and should not be on the tweet at all. Please do not use community notes simply to be funny, nor encourage it.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1649969527818534912
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 232B9F8848A0BEC776DA37EA0ECF71A1A4FC625EF2D2E672DE7CB535DE29ED3B
  • createdAtMillis - 1682218971396
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1649969527818534912232B9F8848A0BEC776DA37EA0ECF71A1A4FC625EF2D2E672DE7CB535DE29ED3B