Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-23 02:09:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CC88EADD3E8A14056CE49AA15B1D521347A51DD1BC9A901FCB66FE99A6011B1B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Esta persona explica en sus propias palabras porqué actuó en cierta manera; esto es materia de opinión personal, no un hecho que se pueda desmentir objetivamente. Opiniones en desacuerdo deberían escribirse en las respuestas al tweet, no en notas de la comunidad. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/es/contributing/values.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1649874715089969152
participantId -
raterParticipantId - CC88EADD3E8A14056CE49AA15B1D521347A51DD1BC9A901FCB66FE99A6011B1B
createdAtMillis - 1682215745236
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1649874715089969152CC88EADD3E8A14056CE49AA15B1D521347A51DD1BC9A901FCB66FE99A6011B1B