Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-23 06:53:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AB30E6991EA622A5CEA81065EC1C02DF81B0E7FA786CA4FD4DF7F705A0C4130B
Participant Details

Original Note:

David is expressing contrast to what is more important concerning corruption and blue checks. The NYTimes has a paywall and is notoriously unreliable. To get facts one must go to the source, the House and it's Representatives. The merits can be argued in thread. No note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1649843077862014977
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AB30E6991EA622A5CEA81065EC1C02DF81B0E7FA786CA4FD4DF7F705A0C4130B
  • createdAtMillis - 1682232826766
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1649843077862014977AB30E6991EA622A5CEA81065EC1C02DF81B0E7FA786CA4FD4DF7F705A0C4130B