Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-23 00:42:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9CDED71743C5E7C95C082079AB168FB47B229631F39C79DD07C3628A8E5B771E
Participant Details

Original Note:

David is expressing contrast to what is more important concerning corruption and blue checks. The NYTimes has a paywall and is notoriously unreliable. To get facts one must go to the source, the House and it's Representatives. The merits can be argued in thread. No note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1649843077862014977
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9CDED71743C5E7C95C082079AB168FB47B229631F39C79DD07C3628A8E5B771E
  • createdAtMillis - 1682210571569
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16498430778620149779CDED71743C5E7C95C082079AB168FB47B229631F39C79DD07C3628A8E5B771E