Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-22 21:15:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 663FD72AD4D5BBC8EABD98B869B4D2FCEFF817129AE19B2F9A18ECAC68702719
Participant Details

Original Note:

David is expressing contrast to what is more important concerning corruption and blue checks. The NYTimes has a paywall and is notoriously unreliable. To get facts one must go to the source, the House and it's Representatives. The merits can be argued in thread. No note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1649843077862014977
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 663FD72AD4D5BBC8EABD98B869B4D2FCEFF817129AE19B2F9A18ECAC68702719
  • createdAtMillis - 1682198136353
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1649843077862014977663FD72AD4D5BBC8EABD98B869B4D2FCEFF817129AE19B2F9A18ECAC68702719