Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-22 18:22:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 363DF2A75818A294AC449DAD4135531EBCDA0387DB93F9388EE696E9B4E04E1A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is a personal opinion based on a verifiable trend. "Cherrypicked" has been rapidly increasing in frequency in recent years. My anecdotal impression is that this has accelerated since, particularly in political discussions. https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=cherrypicked&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=en-2020

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1649826930374619136
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 363DF2A75818A294AC449DAD4135531EBCDA0387DB93F9388EE696E9B4E04E1A
  • createdAtMillis - 1682187770723
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1649826930374619136363DF2A75818A294AC449DAD4135531EBCDA0387DB93F9388EE696E9B4E04E1A