Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-19 04:36:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D45A2C2D0A01452EB4CAC563989CA4D4828760FB2A92310BCB8E87CE1A83E5A9
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is accurate; there's the no word of own in the 2nd Amendment. More importantly, this is the author's opinion about the meaning of 2nd amendment. Bringing up court rulings (which, should be noted, can be overturned down the line) should belong in replies, not notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1649576827126525953
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D45A2C2D0A01452EB4CAC563989CA4D4828760FB2A92310BCB8E87CE1A83E5A9
  • createdAtMillis - 1684471019669
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1649576827126525953D45A2C2D0A01452EB4CAC563989CA4D4828760FB2A92310BCB8E87CE1A83E5A9