Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-22 11:37:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B9721ED6E40DF57C49D9D7D7BD13F24D6A152EA115BF1B89B52C7F0FD36A8BA8
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is accurate; there's the no word of own in the 2nd Amendment. More importantly, this is the author's opinion about the meaning of 2nd amendment. Bringing up court rulings (which, should be noted, can be overturned down the line) should belong in replies, not notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1649576827126525953
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B9721ED6E40DF57C49D9D7D7BD13F24D6A152EA115BF1B89B52C7F0FD36A8BA8
  • createdAtMillis - 1682163445329
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1649576827126525953B9721ED6E40DF57C49D9D7D7BD13F24D6A152EA115BF1B89B52C7F0FD36A8BA8