Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-22 02:24:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3F0D3AF509F13DB379D0409C2DAB0E5499F81A85865B103FE0E6A4565E8FB833
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is accurate; there's the no word of own in the 2nd Amendment. More importantly, this is the author's opinion about the meaning of 2nd amendment. Bringing up court rulings (which, should be noted, can be overturned down the line) should belong in replies, not notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1649576827126525953
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3F0D3AF509F13DB379D0409C2DAB0E5499F81A85865B103FE0E6A4565E8FB833
  • createdAtMillis - 1682130276676
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16495768271265259533F0D3AF509F13DB379D0409C2DAB0E5499F81A85865B103FE0E6A4565E8FB833