Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-22 00:55:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 28F4C17A71AF3BD571E62DC506DF85B227A9838664238562BB1D142A42F9C3BD
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is accurate; there's the no word of own in the 2nd Amendment. More importantly, this is the author's opinion about the meaning of 2nd amendment. Bringing up court rulings (which, should be noted, can be overturned down the line) should belong in replies, not notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1649576827126525953
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 28F4C17A71AF3BD571E62DC506DF85B227A9838664238562BB1D142A42F9C3BD
  • createdAtMillis - 1682124923022
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 164957682712652595328F4C17A71AF3BD571E62DC506DF85B227A9838664238562BB1D142A42F9C3BD