Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-21 18:05:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D554BDB2A4397C56167ADF0E5D76409B2EDC0EE0D45C142E6AD8D729AE817A0C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweeter already states that they don't know if the verbiage is new, and the wording itself is vague enough to leave itself open to interpretation regardless of companies' previously expressed practices. Tweet is opinion, note not needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1649287130810826752
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D554BDB2A4397C56167ADF0E5D76409B2EDC0EE0D45C142E6AD8D729AE817A0C
  • createdAtMillis - 1682100308604
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1649287130810826752D554BDB2A4397C56167ADF0E5D76409B2EDC0EE0D45C142E6AD8D729AE817A0C