Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-21 06:36:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4230FD10786823D430C76BE25C7E1E28D30010F8B26A32F9158ACAE21905362F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweeter already states that they don't know if the verbiage is new, and the wording itself is vague enough to leave itself open to interpretation regardless of companies' previously expressed practices. Tweet is opinion, note not needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1649287130810826752
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4230FD10786823D430C76BE25C7E1E28D30010F8B26A32F9158ACAE21905362F
  • createdAtMillis - 1682058988188
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16492871308108267524230FD10786823D430C76BE25C7E1E28D30010F8B26A32F9158ACAE21905362F