Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-21 06:36:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 10C31E52C3FB3B2B28451ED241CE672514BB649CA2731025BF167A4F3E4C926A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweeter already states that they don't know if the verbiage is new, and the wording itself is vague enough to leave itself open to interpretation regardless of companies' previously expressed practices. Tweet is opinion, note not needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1649287130810826752
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 10C31E52C3FB3B2B28451ED241CE672514BB649CA2731025BF167A4F3E4C926A
  • createdAtMillis - 1682058988188
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 164928713081082675210C31E52C3FB3B2B28451ED241CE672514BB649CA2731025BF167A4F3E4C926A