Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-21 06:28:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 06FE9E4C4466D81471480AD85314B1CE0E9F6A020019305C4F3C3857FFDB8265
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweeter already states that they don't know if the verbiage is new, and the wording itself is vague enough to leave itself open to interpretation regardless of companies' previously expressed practices. Tweet is opinion, note not needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1649287130810826752
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 06FE9E4C4466D81471480AD85314B1CE0E9F6A020019305C4F3C3857FFDB8265
  • createdAtMillis - 1682058524114
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 164928713081082675206FE9E4C4466D81471480AD85314B1CE0E9F6A020019305C4F3C3857FFDB8265