Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-21 04:12:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9B61D58D9E0D3CC30864EE232DFB8FC1112FB49C1CDBE997E4233C3138B788CD
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweeter is clearly joking with the over-the-top “first amendment violation” line. Their statements about the Hunter story linking to that rule are also true. No note needed on this tweet. https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/hacked-materials

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1649246340868722690
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9B61D58D9E0D3CC30864EE232DFB8FC1112FB49C1CDBE997E4233C3138B788CD
  • createdAtMillis - 1682050321430
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16492463408687226909B61D58D9E0D3CC30864EE232DFB8FC1112FB49C1CDBE997E4233C3138B788CD