Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-21 13:59:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8F4F865F0089CE1805AE5281F6DBC29061152DF6F211802DE9C1BA713A6ED5DA
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweeter is clearly joking with the over-the-top “first amendment violation” line. Their statements about the Hunter story linking to that rule are also true. No note needed on this tweet. https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/hacked-materials

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1649246340868722690
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8F4F865F0089CE1805AE5281F6DBC29061152DF6F211802DE9C1BA713A6ED5DA
  • createdAtMillis - 1682085576284
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16492463408687226908F4F865F0089CE1805AE5281F6DBC29061152DF6F211802DE9C1BA713A6ED5DA