Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-21 08:15:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F66B674E7EF563B1248D5E5A71BF6E7FEE67A47C6A792F8E027EDC5E4700DB0F
Participant Details

Original Note:

SCOTUSblog does not need to pay to post on Twitter, just as it does not pay to post on TikTok where it is also unverified. It only needs to pay Twitter if it wants the additional verification service.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1649180478187122689
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F66B674E7EF563B1248D5E5A71BF6E7FEE67A47C6A792F8E027EDC5E4700DB0F
  • createdAtMillis - 1682064924068
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1649180478187122689F66B674E7EF563B1248D5E5A71BF6E7FEE67A47C6A792F8E027EDC5E4700DB0F