Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-21 08:42:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B1868A7AE94E1E844D0FAA0615EEEDD8725A3E796EC97A3EBD3ACEFBE0D7E8C5
Participant Details

Original Note:

SCOTUSblog does not need to pay to post on Twitter, just as it does not pay to post on TikTok where it is also unverified. It only needs to pay Twitter if it wants the additional verification service.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1649180478187122689
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B1868A7AE94E1E844D0FAA0615EEEDD8725A3E796EC97A3EBD3ACEFBE0D7E8C5
  • createdAtMillis - 1682066546840
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1649180478187122689B1868A7AE94E1E844D0FAA0615EEEDD8725A3E796EC97A3EBD3ACEFBE0D7E8C5