Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-21 01:24:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5B62F0DFA15C064AA7E6F9E0B2F3D2E29DDF050FCA3029EC6B79FDC41CEDFD54
Participant Details

Original Note:

SCOTUSblog does not need to pay to post on Twitter, just as it does not pay to post on TikTok where it is also unverified. It only needs to pay Twitter if it wants the additional verification service.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1649180478187122689
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5B62F0DFA15C064AA7E6F9E0B2F3D2E29DDF050FCA3029EC6B79FDC41CEDFD54
  • createdAtMillis - 1682040285976
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16491804781871226895B62F0DFA15C064AA7E6F9E0B2F3D2E29DDF050FCA3029EC6B79FDC41CEDFD54