Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-20 23:51:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3B4EB1D0E258C4B89A9EC493EAE6F7F3338AC86C27926D73FE05A59E86581ADF
Participant Details

Original Note:

SCOTUSblog does not need to pay to post on Twitter, just as it does not pay to post on TikTok where it is also unverified. It only needs to pay Twitter if it wants the additional verification service.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1649180478187122689
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3B4EB1D0E258C4B89A9EC493EAE6F7F3338AC86C27926D73FE05A59E86581ADF
  • createdAtMillis - 1682034673262
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16491804781871226893B4EB1D0E258C4B89A9EC493EAE6F7F3338AC86C27926D73FE05A59E86581ADF