Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-20 23:05:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 229C202EF7EDEA5C1436315A20A84B41528F21942269DBA094E9B974C3244F2F
Participant Details

Original Note:

SCOTUSblog does not need to pay to post on Twitter, just as it does not pay to post on TikTok where it is also unverified. It only needs to pay Twitter if it wants the additional verification service.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1649180478187122689
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 229C202EF7EDEA5C1436315A20A84B41528F21942269DBA094E9B974C3244F2F
  • createdAtMillis - 1682031950098
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1649180478187122689229C202EF7EDEA5C1436315A20A84B41528F21942269DBA094E9B974C3244F2F