Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-04-20 21:15:00 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: DFD4363CE2C34AB1BFB523A746ADAE82FCF09286FB49F16D2D5CB89CE3106B6F
Participant Details
Original Note:
The rule used was indeed the same https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2021/09/15/twitter-acted-lawfully-in-restricting-nypost-hunter-biden-article-fec.html The mentioning to the First Amendment is sarcastic, referencing the accusations by critics of Twitter's removal of tweets regarding content found in Hunter Biden's laptop in 2020, who alleged it to be a violation of the First Amendment. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/lawsuit-filed-against-biden-top-officials-colluding-big-tech-censor-speech-hunter-covid
All Note Details