Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-20 14:12:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B636879CE329B6938DEB4327DB7899CC60C64E424F6994D19204722D17FBAF27
Participant Details

Original Note:

The rule used was indeed the same https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2021/09/15/twitter-acted-lawfully-in-restricting-nypost-hunter-biden-article-fec.html The mentioning to the First Amendment is sarcastic, referencing the accusations by critics of Twitter's removal of tweets regarding content found in Hunter Biden's laptop in 2020, who alleged it to be a violation of the First Amendment. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/lawsuit-filed-against-biden-top-officials-colluding-big-tech-censor-speech-hunter-covid

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1649043321405276160
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B636879CE329B6938DEB4327DB7899CC60C64E424F6994D19204722D17FBAF27
  • createdAtMillis - 1681999938443
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1649043321405276160B636879CE329B6938DEB4327DB7899CC60C64E424F6994D19204722D17FBAF27