Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-04-20 17:13:31 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 72A59FB5955991E68C6349DA62C35A734500BE2AEFDA828D7BB704AB0E76465C
Participant Details
Original Note:
The rule used was indeed the same https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2021/09/15/twitter-acted-lawfully-in-restricting-nypost-hunter-biden-article-fec.html The mentioning to the First Amendment is sarcastic, referencing the accusations by critics of Twitter's removal of tweets regarding content found in Hunter Biden's laptop in 2020, who alleged it to be a violation of the First Amendment. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/lawsuit-filed-against-biden-top-officials-colluding-big-tech-censor-speech-hunter-covid
All Note Details