Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-04-21 13:58:19 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 6F4955856F2A0E3A34AF53EB0BC0D8B495E1F8FA7EE2280C7593738FCA7315F3
Participant Details
Original Note:
The rule used was indeed the same https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2021/09/15/twitter-acted-lawfully-in-restricting-nypost-hunter-biden-article-fec.html The mentioning to the First Amendment is sarcastic, referencing the accusations by critics of Twitter's removal of tweets regarding content found in Hunter Biden's laptop in 2020, who alleged it to be a violation of the First Amendment. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/lawsuit-filed-against-biden-top-officials-colluding-big-tech-censor-speech-hunter-covid
All Note Details