Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-05-04 16:26:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 153141863F18E11C77D68AEEEEE99DB7A67567B729A091623B0E2B532EACF7F4
Participant Details
Original Note:
The rule used was indeed the same https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2021/09/15/twitter-acted-lawfully-in-restricting-nypost-hunter-biden-article-fec.html The mentioning to the First Amendment is sarcastic, referencing the accusations by critics of Twitter's removal of tweets regarding content found in Hunter Biden's laptop in 2020, who alleged it to be a violation of the First Amendment. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/lawsuit-filed-against-biden-top-officials-colluding-big-tech-censor-speech-hunter-covid
All Note Details