Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-04-20 20:46:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 0ABF1E0B62F9B518D5E0A7A25C91827DB9715ED61E98110F6AD503F98C3673A2
Participant Details
Original Note:
The rule used was indeed the same https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2021/09/15/twitter-acted-lawfully-in-restricting-nypost-hunter-biden-article-fec.html The mentioning to the First Amendment is sarcastic, referencing the accusations by critics of Twitter's removal of tweets regarding content found in Hunter Biden's laptop in 2020, who alleged it to be a violation of the First Amendment. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/lawsuit-filed-against-biden-top-officials-colluding-big-tech-censor-speech-hunter-covid
All Note Details